“You have to have a catcher because if you don’t you’re likely to have a lot of passed balls.” ~ Casey Stengel
In 1876, Fred Thayer, the team manager of Harvard’s baseball team, took a fencing mask, tinkered with it, and turned it into baseball’s first catcher’s mask. It didn’t take long for other catchers to catch on.
Thayer’s original catcher’s mask patent.
Fans, according to The New York Times, hated the innovation, considering a protective mask a sign of weakness. They jeered at catchers who wore them. (Batting helmets? Shin guards? Thumb protectors? Today’s game would drive our great-great-great grandparents nutty.)
The mask annoyed fans, but it changed the game. It allowed catchers to be much closer to the batter. It allowed pitchers to amp up their pitches without worrying about killing their catcher with an errant throw.
By 1878, Spalding had added it to their sporting goods’ catalog.
Goat hair and dog skin. $3.
Today’s best masks can run to more than $100. (Which, if you ask me, is a pretty small price to pay to keep your nose, cheekbone, and brain intact.) No more dog skin either. Progress.
It’s hard to know what’s going on behind those “tools of ignorance.” It’s hard to see a catcher’s face, especially way out in the bleachers.
Matt Thaiss, gritty catcher for the University of Virginia, is tough as nails.
“He won’t give up,” UVA pitcher Alec Bettinger told The Daily Progress last week. “He could have his legs chopped off and he’d still go out there and catch. He’s just the toughest guy on the team.”
But, sometimes, when you look inside the mask …
… he seems almost angelic.
Which just goes to show …
I don’t really know what it goes to show. But, sometimes the face you find behind a mask isn’t always the face you expected to find.
In response to the Word Press Daily Post Photo Challenge: Face. See more challenge photos here.
Photos: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 2015-2016 © The Baseball Bloggess